You are viewing 1 of your 1 free articles. For unlimited access take a risk-free trial
Does mental fatigue reduce physical performance in team sport athletes? Andrew Sheaff looks at some recent evidence
Every athlete is aware of the impact of physical fatigue on performance in sport. What’s becoming increasingly apparent is that mental fatigue can influence physical performance as well. That is, activities which have a high cognitive demand, yet no physical demand can still directly influence physical performance. And as modern life becomes increasingly cognitively challenging rather than physically challenging, understanding the role of mental fatigue has become increasingly important.
Much of the research on mental fatigue in sport over the past two decades has been performed in endurance sports, and consistently demonstrated that mental fatigue does impair performance. However, less work has been done in team sports, where the demands are often more intense, but shorter lived but it remains to be seen if the same dynamics are at play here – ie whether mental fatigue in the absence of physical fatigue can still directly influence physical performance in repeated high intensity exercise. The good news is that more recent research has sought to shed light on the impact of mental fatigue in team sports athletes.
In an excellent study on this topic, an international group of researchers investigated the relationship between mental fatigue and team sport performance(1). To do this, the researchers recruited 18 male team sport players to participate in the study. All of the participants were recreationally active and members of amateur team sport clubs, with a participation history of at least three years. And while not elite athletes, they were very experienced with an established training background. The researchers’ aim was to determine the precise influence of mental fatigue on physical performance during tests that were representative of the actual physical challenges athletes face in team sport competition.
The athletes firstly performed a baseline testing battery to determine their physical abilities. On separate dates, they then performed either a mentally fatiguing test or a control condition:
To help account for confounding factors that could reduce the accuracy of the results, the researchers used a ‘within subjects’ study design. Because the intervention took place during a single day, all subjects performed both the experimental protocol and as well as the control protocol. At least ten days separated the two interventions to ensure that there was no cross influence between the two.
A series of physical and psychological tests were performed to assess physical performance and the amount of mental fatigue. Prior to performing the experimental or control condition, subjects were tested for their vertical jump height capacity, performed a psychomotor vigilance test, and filled out a visual analogue mental fatigue scale. As the name implies, this test measures perception of mental fatigue. The jump test is a simple to way to measure physical abilities, whereas the psychomotor vigilance test uses reaction times to assess cognitive state. Following the experimental conditions, the subjects repeated the psychomotor vigilance and jump tests, as well as the visual analogue mental fatigue scale.
The subjects then performed a repeated sprint ability test and a repeated jump ability test to measure their capacity to repeatedly perform high intensity exercise. Performance was measured, as well as blood lactate prior to and following the tests. In addition, a motivation questionnaire was given prior to the performance tests, and the NASA-TLX questionnaire was given after. This test measures, effort, frustration, and mental and physical demand. This was carried out because while the researchers wanted to know whether mental fatigue affected performance, they also wanted to know which internal changes lead to changes influencing performance, and whether those changes were physical or psychological.
The results clearly demonstrated a negative influence of mental fatigue on physical performance. Following the induced mental fatigue condition, there was a significantly larger decrement in repeated sprint ability and repeated jump ability performance (see figure 1). The mean times during the sprints were significantly higher in the mental fatigue condition (figure 1), and the mean jump heights were significantly lower.
Interestingly, there was no difference in countermovement jump performance at any point in the testing. However, there was a significantly slower reaction time during the psychomotor vigilance test in the mental fatigue condition when measured immediately after the Stroop test had been carried out. This difference persisted following the repeated sprint and jump ability tests.
When looking at the physiological data, there was no difference in heart rate or blood lactate levels at any point during the tests. However, the rating of perceived exertion was significantly higher at every point during the repeated sprint ability test in the mental fatigue condition, and it was significantly higher following the repeated jump ability test. According to the NASA-TLX, mental demand and effort were significantly higher in the experimental (Stroop task) condition compared to the control.
The results clearly demonstrate that mental fatigue does negatively influence physical performance – but what is particularly interesting is that it does so without directly affecting physiological parameters. Heart rate and lactate data indicate that the physiological stress between the two conditions was similar, yet performance was quite different. Furthermore, changes in the mental perception of the work were different, and these differences led directly to changes in performance.

While the impact of physical fatigue on physical performance is fairly obvious, it’s becoming more and more apparent that mental fatigue directly influences performance as well. Therefore if coaches and athletes don’t account for (and control) the impact of mental fatigue, they may be compromising training and competitive efforts. Unfortunately, mental fatigue is a part of life, stemming from academic, professional, and familial responsibilities. Almost every athlete will have one, two, or all three of these demands in their life.
There are several potential solutions here. First, athletes and coaches should be mindful of times when there are unusually high levels of mental fatigue. Training might need to be adjusted, and increased attention paid to promoting recovery through relaxation, extra sleep, and other strategies to alleviate mental fatigue. Secondly, these recovery activities can be preemptively built into the training program to ensure that the effects of mental fatigue are mitigated to the extent that it’s possible. As the study has shown failure to account for the impact of mental fatigue can negatively impact performance, even in the absence of physical changes.
1. Sci Med Sport. 2024 Feb;27(2):105-112. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2023.10.016. Epub 2023 Nov 2.
Today you have the chance to join a group of athletes, and sports coaches/trainers who all have something special in common...
They use the latest research to improve performance for themselves and their clients - both athletes and sports teams - with help from global specialists in the fields of sports science, sports medicine and sports psychology.
They do this by reading Sports Performance Bulletin, an easy-to-digest but serious-minded journal dedicated to high performance sports. SPB offers a wealth of information and insight into the latest research, in an easily-accessible and understood format, along with a wealth of practical recommendations.
*includes 3 coaching manuals
Get Inspired
All the latest techniques and approaches
Sports Performance Bulletin helps dedicated endurance athletes improve their performance. Sense-checking the latest sports science research, and sourcing evidence and case studies to support findings, Sports Performance Bulletin turns proven insights into easily digestible practical advice. Supporting athletes, coaches and professionals who wish to ensure their guidance and programmes are kept right up to date and based on credible science.